Adds schema creating csv schema with View #195
Conversation
|
@Qnzvna this looks very useful, thank you! I think I have some comments wrt implementation, but in general I think I like the idea. Just one practical thing before I can merge this: unless I have asked for CLA: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson/blob/master/contributor-agreement.pdf I would one before first contributions (but only then; future contributions can all be under existing CLA then). |
| @@ -460,6 +487,18 @@ protected void _addSchemaProperties(SerializerProvider ctxt, CsvSchema.Builder b | |||
| BeanDescription beanDesc = ctxt.introspectBeanDescription(pojoType); | |||
| final AnnotationIntrospector intr = ctxt.getAnnotationIntrospector(); | |||
| for (BeanPropertyDefinition prop : beanDesc.findProperties()) { | |||
| if (view != null) { | |||
| boolean viewVisible = false; | |||
| for(Class<?> propView : prop.findViews()) { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Needs null check, findViews() can return null. Also note that in databind BeanDeserializerFactory method addBeanProps(), there is:
Class<?>[] views = propDef.findViews();
if (views == null) {
views = beanDesc.findDefaultViews();
}
| if (view != null) { | ||
| boolean viewVisible = false; | ||
| for(Class<?> propView : prop.findViews()) { | ||
| if (propView.equals(view)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not sufficient: Views actually check inheritance too (so, say, CharSequence as inclusion would be acceptable for View String).
You might be able to use databind's ViewMatcher for checks:
public static ViewMatcher construct(Class<?>[] views) { }
and then calling method:
public boolean isVisibleForView(Class<?> activeView) { ...}
seems like the proper (and still simple) way to go.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks, updated also.
Qnzvna
force-pushed
the
csv-schema-with-view
branch
from
298bca6
to
07c084c
Compare
|
I've signed the CLA before when providing different contributions. |
|
@Qnzvna Ahh! I did find the CLA from 2017. Thank you! |
|
Excellent: I backport this in 2.11 branch and this will just make it in 2.11.0 thanks to timing. Thank you again for contributing this new feature! |
|
Thanks for merging so quickly. |
|
@Qnzvna and 2.11.0 is actually out now! Perfect timing. :) |
No description provided.